Since states started rolling back pandemic-inspired flexibilities that allowed physicians to easily practice telehealth across state lines, virtual health care providers have criticized state-based medical licensure rules as unnecessarily burdensome, expensive, and detrimental to patient care.
Now, two of them are arguing in a lawsuit that they can also be unconstitutional.
On Wednesday, a neurosurgeon, an oncologist, and two New Jersey-based patients sued the state’s medical board, alleging that the state’s licensure requirements for doctors practicing via telemedicine restrict livesaving access to specialty care. The case marks a newly aggressive strategy as health care systems and regulators continue to debate the role of state medical licensing in an increasingly virtual health care system.
This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers
Unlock this article — and get additional analysis of the technologies disrupting health care — by subscribing to STAT+.
Already have an account? Log in
Already have an account? Log in
About the Author Reprints
To submit a correction request, please visit our Contact Us page.
STAT encourages you to share your voice. We welcome your commentary, criticism, and expertise on our subscriber-only platform, STAT+ Connect